Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Martin v. Schindley

Martin v. Schindley

446 S.E.2d 797, 213 Ga. App. 598, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 689
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. Schindley. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 Ga. App. 270 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 22, 1994·No. A93A1700·Published

Opinion

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case having been reversed by the Supreme Court, Martin v. Schindley, 264 Ga. 142 (442 SE2d 239), the decision in Martin v. Schindley, 210 Ga. App. [599]*599270 (435 SE2d 716), is hereby vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. The case is remanded to the trial court for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Decided June 22, 1994. William I. Sykes, Jr., Susan D. Brown, for appellant. Dodd & Kinsey, Jack E. Dodd, James B. Kinsey, for appellee.

Judgment vacated and remanded with direction.

Pope, C. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Schindley, 446 S.E.2d 797, 213 Ga. App. 598, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 689 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

446 S.E.2d 797 (Martin v. Schindley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Schindley
442 S.E.2d 239 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)
Martin v. Schindley
435 S.E.2d 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)