Martin v. Schindley

446 S.E.2d 797, 213 Ga. App. 598, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 689
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 22, 1994
DocketA93A1700
StatusPublished

This text of 446 S.E.2d 797 (Martin v. Schindley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Schindley, 446 S.E.2d 797, 213 Ga. App. 598, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 689 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case having been reversed by the Supreme Court, Martin v. Schindley, 264 Ga. 142 (442 SE2d 239), the decision in Martin v. Schindley, 210 Ga. App. [599]*599270 (435 SE2d 716), is hereby vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court. The case is remanded to the trial court for proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Decided June 22, 1994. William I. Sykes, Jr., Susan D. Brown, for appellant. Dodd & Kinsey, Jack E. Dodd, James B. Kinsey, for appellee.

Judgment vacated and remanded with direction.

Pope, C. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Schindley
442 S.E.2d 239 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)
Martin v. Schindley
435 S.E.2d 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
446 S.E.2d 797, 213 Ga. App. 598, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-schindley-gactapp-1994.