Martin v. Sandkuhl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Martin v. Sandkuhl

84 A.D.2d 745, 449 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 84 A.D.2d 745 (Martin v. Sandkuhl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Sandkuhl, 84 A.D.2d 745, 449 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeMatteo, R.), dated April 16, 1980, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. (Defendant has apparently abandoned an appeal from a prior order of the same court, dated Feb. 19, 1980. In any event, that order was superseded by the granting of reargument on April 16, 1980.) Hopkins, J.P., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DeMatteo, R.), dated April 16, 1980, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. (Defendant has apparently abandoned an appeal from a prior order of the same court, dated Feb. 19, 1980. In any event, that order was superseded by the granting of reargument on April 16, 1980.) Hopkins, J.P., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 A.D.2d 745, 449 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-sandkuhl-nyappdiv-1981.