Martin v. Raborn
42 Ala. 648
This text of 42 Ala. 648 (Martin v. Raborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Martin v. Raborn, 42 Ala. 648 (Ala. 1868).
Opinion
A. J. WALKER, C. J.
The ward was entitled at his election to have the property in which his guardian invested his funds, and also the profits derived from those funds. The relief of the ward in this case will involve the necessity of divesting titles to real estate and taking an account of profits. The powers of the probate court were not adequate to grant the relief sought by the complainant.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stude v. Gross
179 Iowa 785 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1917)
Dacovich v. Canizas
44 So. 473 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 Ala. 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-raborn-ala-1868.