Martin v. Poole
This text of 207 So. 2d 429 (Martin v. Poole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date of December 1, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied. Attorneys’ fees in the amount of $250.00 are accordingly awarded to Messrs. Miller, Cone, Owen, Wagner, Nugent & Johnson, West Palm Beach, Florida, attorneys for claimant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 So. 2d 429, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-poole-fla-1968.