Martin v. Pepper

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2007·No. 07-7051·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7051

HENRY W. MARTIN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EARNESTINE M. PEPPER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:07-cv-01116-HMH)

Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 11, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry W. Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Henry W. Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Pepper,

No. 6:07-cv-01116-HMH (D.S.C. June 25, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Pepper, (4th Cir. 2007).

Martin v. Pepper (Martin v. Pepper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related