Martin v. Pennsylvania State Real Estate Commission

493 U.S. 987, 110 S. Ct. 532, 107 L. Ed. 2d 530, 58 U.S.L.W. 3352, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 5550

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 27, 1989·No. No. 89-5271·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ante, p. 883. Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Pennsylvania State Real Estate Commission, 493 U.S. 987, 110 S. Ct. 532, 107 L. Ed. 2d 530, 58 U.S.L.W. 3352, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 5550 (1989).

Pincite

493 U.S. 987 (Martin v. Pennsylvania State Real Estate Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

In Re Gomez

206 B.R. 663 (E.D. New York, 1997)

League of United Latin American Citizens, Council No. 4434 v. Clements

999 F.2d 831 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)

Ragsdale v. Turnock

941 F.2d 501 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)

Richard M. Ragsdale, M.D., Individually and on Behalf of All Other Physicians Similarly Situated v. Bernard J. Turnock, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health, and Kenneth M. Reed, as Expectant Father and Next Friend of Baby Reed, Proposed Intervenors-Appellants. Richard M. Ragsdale, M.D., Individually and on Behalf of All Other Physicians Similarly Situated, and Ritaellen M. Murphy and Penny R. Greenwood, Members of the Class Consisting of All Illinois Women of Child-Bearing Age Who Desire or May Desire an Abortion Sometime in the Future v. Bernard J. Turnock, Director of the Illinois Department of Public Health, and Kenneth M. Reed, as Expectant Father and Next Friend of Baby Reed, Proposed Intervenors-Appellants

941 F.2d 501 (Seventh Circuit, 1991)

Opinion

Related