Martin v. Peddy

48 S.E. 420, 120 Ga. 1079, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 804
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 12, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 48 S.E. 420 (Martin v. Peddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Peddy, 48 S.E. 420, 120 Ga. 1079, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 804 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

3?ish, P. J.

1. In a sale of timber growing upon land, if the purchase is per acre, a deficiency in the number of acres may be apportioned in the price. See Civil Code, § 3542. This is true although both parties have an equal opportunity to judge for themselves as to the number of acres, and act in good faith.

2. If a sale of growing timber be at a stipulated price per acre, a given portion of the purchase-money to be paid in advance, the balance when half the number of acres — to be determined by a survey — shall be cut by the venadee, and upon such a survey it is ascertained that the actual number of acres sold, at the agreed price, aggregates a sum less than the amount paid in advance, the vendee may recover such difference from the vendor.

3. In such a case the provisions of the Civil Code, §§ 3974, 3983, and 3984, as to when relief will be granted in equity for a mistake of fact,- are not applicable.

4. In a contract of sale of .growing timber for sawmill purposes, the words “one certain lot of yellow pipe timber for sawmill purposes ” mean timber suitable for sawmill purposes.

Submitted July 16, Decided August 12, 1904. Assumpsit. Before Judge Parker. Johnson superior* court. December 7, 1903. U. I. Stephens, for plaintiffs in error. J. L. Kent, contra.

5. That the judge, on the trial of a ease, declines ‘to permit counsel to read, a decision of the Supreme Court, which, in the opinion of the judge, is not applicable to the facts of the case on trial, is not cause for a new trial. Nor is it error for the judge to state, in the presence of the jury, that a given decision is not applicable to the case on trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Evans, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dorsey v. Clements
41 S.E.2d 797 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Adel Manufacturing Co. v. McDermid
103 S.E. 223 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)
Mills & Williams v. Ivey
60 S.E. 299 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Pennington v. Avera
52 S.E. 324 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Allison v. Wall
49 S.E. 831 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 S.E. 420, 120 Ga. 1079, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-peddy-ga-1904.