Martin v. Patrick Industries, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Martin v. Patrick Industries, Inc.

266 F. App'x 271

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 21, 2008

DocketNo. 07-1324

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 F. App'x 271 (Martin v. Patrick Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Patrick Industries, Inc., 266 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Paul J. Martin appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Patrick Industries, Incorporated. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Patrick Indus., Inc., 478 F.Supp.2d 855 (2007). We [272]*272dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Paul J. Martin appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee Patrick Industries, Incorporated. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Patrick Indus., Inc., 478 F.Supp.2d 855 (2007). We [272]*272dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 F. App'x 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-patrick-industries-inc-ca4-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack