Martin v. One 1941 Plymouth

79 S.E.2d 710, 224 S.C. 432, 1953 S.C. LEXIS 115
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 7, 1953·No. 16803·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Neither the complaint (if it was verified) nor the affidavit upon which the writ of attachment was issued, is set out in the record, but merely a paragraph or sentence therefrom. The record does not contain sufficient information to enable us to intelligently pass upon the alleged issue in this case; and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

Baker, C. J., and Stukes, Taylor, and Oxner, JJ., and Littlejohn, A. A. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. One 1941 Plymouth, 79 S.E.2d 710, 224 S.C. 432, 1953 S.C. LEXIS 115 (S.C. 1953).

79 S.E.2d 710 (Martin v. One 1941 Plymouth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

South Carolina National Bank v. B. H. Stepp Co.
151 S.E.2d 752 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1966)