Martin v. One 1941 Plymouth

79 S.E.2d 710, 224 S.C. 432, 1953 S.C. LEXIS 115
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 7, 1953
Docket16803
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 S.E.2d 710 (Martin v. One 1941 Plymouth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. One 1941 Plymouth, 79 S.E.2d 710, 224 S.C. 432, 1953 S.C. LEXIS 115 (S.C. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Neither the complaint (if it was verified) nor the affidavit upon which the writ of attachment was issued, is set out in the record, but merely a paragraph or sentence therefrom. The record does not contain sufficient information to enable us to intelligently pass upon the alleged issue in this case; and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

Baker, C. J., and Stukes, Taylor, and Oxner, JJ., and Littlejohn, A. A. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

South Carolina National Bank v. B. H. Stepp Co.
151 S.E.2d 752 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 S.E.2d 710, 224 S.C. 432, 1953 S.C. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-one-1941-plymouth-sc-1953.