Martin v. Obama

Fourth Circuit

Martin v. Obama

474 F. App'x 396

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2012·No. No. 12-1681·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Guy Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the political question doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Obama, No. 1:11-cv-03444-RDB, 2012 WL 1380366 (D.Md. Apr. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Guy Martin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the political question doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Obama, No. 1:11-cv-03444-RDB, 2012 WL 1380366 (D.Md. Apr. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Martin v. Obama, 474 F. App'x 396 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 396 (Martin v. Obama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.