Martin v. Nixon
This text of Martin v. Nixon (Martin v. Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JAMES L. MARTIN, § § Plaintiff Below, § No. 440, 2023 Appellant, § § Court Below–Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § DAVID H. NIXON, § C.A. No. N17C-08-152 § Defendant Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: April 19, 2024 Decided: June 21, 2024
Before VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, and LEGROW, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it
evident that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the
reasons cited by the Superior Court in its October 31, 2023 order denying the
appellant’s supplemental amended renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law,
the appellant’s amended motion to alter or amend the judgment, and the appellant’s
motion to reopen the judgment. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior
Court be AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Martin v. Nixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-nixon-del-2024.