Martin v. New York and Stamford Railway Company
175 N.E. 301, 255 N.Y. 534, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 732
Opinion
Judgment affimed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. New York and Stamford Railway Company, 175 N.E. 301, 255 N.Y. 534, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 732 (N.Y. 1930).
175 N.E. 301 (Martin v. New York and Stamford Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.