Martin v. New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Martin v. New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co.

130 F. 394, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4814

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided May 2, 1904·Published

Opinion

COXE, Circuit Judge.

The referee finds that at the date of the service of the summons the defendant was not doing business in the state of New York, and had no office for the transaction of business therein. These findings are fully justified by the proofs.

The report of the referee is confirmed and the motion to set aside service of the summons is granted. Conley v. Mathieson Alkali Works, 190 U. S. 406, 23 Sup. Ct. 728, 47 L. Ed. 1113.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COXE, Circuit Judge.

The referee finds that at the date of the service of the summons the defendant was not doing business in the state of New York, and had no office for the transaction of business therein. These findings are fully justified by the proofs.

The report of the referee is confirmed and the motion to set aside service of the summons is granted. Conley v. Mathieson Alkali Works, 190 U. S. 406, 23 Sup. Ct. 728, 47 L. Ed. 1113.

Martin v. New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co., 130 F. 394, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4814 (circtsdny 1904).

Pincite

130 F. 394 (Martin v. New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related