Martin v. New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Martin v. New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co.

130 F. 394, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4814

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedMay 2, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 130 F. 394 (Martin v. New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co., 130 F. 394, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4814 (circtsdny 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

COXE, Circuit Judge.

The referee finds that at the date of the service of the summons the defendant was not doing business in the state of New York, and had no office for the transaction of business therein. These findings are fully justified by the proofs.

The report of the referee is confirmed and the motion to set aside service of the summons is granted. Conley v. Mathieson Alkali Works, 190 U. S. 406, 23 Sup. Ct. 728, 47 L. Ed. 1113.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COXE, Circuit Judge.

The referee finds that at the date of the service of the summons the defendant was not doing business in the state of New York, and had no office for the transaction of business therein. These findings are fully justified by the proofs.

The report of the referee is confirmed and the motion to set aside service of the summons is granted. Conley v. Mathieson Alkali Works, 190 U. S. 406, 23 Sup. Ct. 728, 47 L. Ed. 1113.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 F. 394, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-new-trinidad-lake-asphalt-co-circtsdny-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack