Martin v. Munshower
660 So. 2d 794, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9954, 1995 WL 553028
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s non-final order granting the plaintiffs motion in limine to limit the evidence presented at trial on the issue of breach of oral lease solely to damages. In Munshower v. Martin, 641 So.2d 909, 911 (Fla. 3d DCA1994), this court previously determined that the buyer, the plaintiff below, is entitled to specific performance of the purchase and sale contract and consequently, to the damages that flow from the seller’s refusal to close.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Munshower, 660 So. 2d 794, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9954, 1995 WL 553028 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
660 So. 2d 794 (Martin v. Munshower) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Munshower v. Martin
641 So. 2d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)