Martin v. Mundy

87 S.E. 1092, 17 Ga. App. 699, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 864
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 27, 1916
Docket6346
StatusPublished

This text of 87 S.E. 1092 (Martin v. Mundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Mundy, 87 S.E. 1092, 17 Ga. App. 699, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 864 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Broyles, J.

The hill of exceptions, duly certified by the trial judge, reciting that in this case, which was an appeal from a justice’s court, there was no summons issued in that court and that there was no service on the defendant Martin, the verdict in the superior court, finding against the defendant Martin as principal and the defendant H. B. Brooks as security, was not authorized by law, and the court erred in entering up judgment against the defendants. Civil Code, §§ 4715, 4716, 4717, 5964, 5968; Jeffers v. Ware, 72 Ga. 135, 136; Parker v. Jennings, 26 Ga. 140; Gunnels v. Deavours, 54 Ga. 496. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. Jennings
26 Ga. 140 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1858)
Gunnels v. Deavours
54 Ga. 496 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1875)
Jeffers v. Ware
72 Ga. 135 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.E. 1092, 17 Ga. App. 699, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-mundy-gactapp-1916.