Martin v. Mundy
This text of 87 S.E. 1092 (Martin v. Mundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The hill of exceptions, duly certified by the trial judge, reciting that in this case, which was an appeal from a justice’s court, there was no summons issued in that court and that there was no service on the defendant Martin, the verdict in the superior court, finding against the defendant Martin as principal and the defendant H. B. Brooks as security, was not authorized by law, and the court erred in entering up judgment against the defendants. Civil Code, §§ 4715, 4716, 4717, 5964, 5968; Jeffers v. Ware, 72 Ga. 135, 136; Parker v. Jennings, 26 Ga. 140; Gunnels v. Deavours, 54 Ga. 496. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 S.E. 1092, 17 Ga. App. 699, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-mundy-gactapp-1916.