Martin v. Moore

63 Ga. 531
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 15, 1879·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Bleckley, Justice.

The plaintiff in error urged fraud, and insisted that the article delivered was different from the one bargained for. He cited 1 Smith’s L. C., 220 ; Code, §2751; 52. Ga., 191; and Allen vs. Young, last term. The defendant in error cited 57 Ga., 350 ; 60 lb., 288, 383. The view which the court took of the case will appear from reading the head-notes, these indicating the reasons for judgment as well as the points adjudged. It was not alleged that the fertilizer was not properly branded, and hence Kleckley vs. Leyden, this term, does not apply.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Moore, 63 Ga. 531 (Ga. 1879).

63 Ga. 531 (Martin v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walnut Creek Milling Co. v. Smith Brothers Co.
173 S.E. 95 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Gunn v. Wilson Co.
92 S.E. 721 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
McNeel v. Smith
32 S.E. 119 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Watkins v. Harris
10 S.E. 447 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1889)
Hardee, Sons & Co. v. Griner
80 Ga. 559 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)