Martin v. Montefiore Medical Center

161 A.D.2d 526

This text of 161 A.D.2d 526 (Martin v. Montefiore Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Montefiore Medical Center, 161 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered November 22, 1988, which denied the defendants’ motion and cross motion to dismiss for failure to timely serve a complaint and granted plaintiff’s cross motion to compel defendants to provide medical records, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff, as administra[527]*527trix of her sister’s estate, failed to serve a complaint with an accompanying certificate of merit (CPLR 3012-a) within the 20-day statutory time period following defendant’s demand therefor. (CPLR 3012 [b].)

Accordingly, defendants hospitals moved to dismiss the action for failure to serve a timely complaint and accompanying certificate of merit. In response to the motion, plaintiff asserted that the defendants failed to respond to her written requests for the deceased’s medical records resulting in the delay and failure complained of by defendants. Defendant, Montefiore, heretofore denied receipt of the letters requesting the medical records. The IAS court denied the defendants’ cross motions to dismiss the action and directed the hospitals to provide plaintiff with the deceased’s medical records. We see no reason to disturb the court’s exercise of discretion.

Without the medical records, the drafting of the complaint and the certificate of merit would have been impossible. The dispute as to whether the demand for the records was received by the hospitals was properly treated by the court as not dispositive since the law is clear that resolution of lawsuits on the merits is favored, especially where, as here, there is no showing of prejudice to defendants. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 A.D.2d 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-montefiore-medical-center-nyappdiv-1990.