Martin v. Moery

1 F.R.D. 130, 1 Fed. R. Serv. 45, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1663
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. Moery. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 F.R.D. 127
District Court, E.D. Illinois·Decided September 23, 1939·No. No. 26·Published

Opinion

WHAM, District Judge.

The general allegation in the amendment to the complaint that the amount in controversy is more than $3,000 is in the nature of a conclusion of fact and is insufficient to sustain the jurisdiction of the court when the allegations of definite and concrete facts in the body of the complaint itself show that less than the jurisdictional amount is involved. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. Karatz, 262 U.S. 77, 78, 86, 43 S.Ct. 480, 67 L.Ed. 871; KVOS v. Associated Press, 299 U.S. 269, 277, 57 S.Ct. 197, 81 L.Ed. 183.

The plaintiffs’ complaint, as amended, must be and is hereby dismissed on defendants’ motion because it appears from the facts stated therein that the jurisdictional amount is not involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Moery, 1 F.R.D. 130, 1 Fed. R. Serv. 45, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1663 (illinoised 1939).

1 F.R.D. 130 (Martin v. Moery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. Karatz
262 U.S. 77 (Supreme Court, 1923)
KVOS, Inc. v. Associated Press
299 U.S. 269 (Supreme Court, 1936)