Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Martin v. Modern Door & Hardware

Martin v. Modern Door & Hardware

630 So. 2d 604, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13050, 1993 WL 499247
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 7, 1993
DocketNo. 93-2587
StatusPublished

This text of 630 So. 2d 604 (Martin v. Modern Door & Hardware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Modern Door & Hardware, 630 So. 2d 604, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13050, 1993 WL 499247 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Judge of Compensation Claims has certified that the tape recording of the final hearing is inaudible and therefore, a record cannot be reconstructed. Remand for a new hearing has been requested and no party has filed an objection. Accordingly, the final order is reversed and the cause is remanded [605]*605for a new hearing. Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

ZEHMER, C.J., and BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris
469 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 So. 2d 604, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13050, 1993 WL 499247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-modern-door-hardware-fladistctapp-1993.