Martin v. Modern Door & Hardware
630 So. 2d 604, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13050, 1993 WL 499247
Opinion
The Judge of Compensation Claims has certified that the tape recording of the final hearing is inaudible and therefore, a record cannot be reconstructed. Remand for a new hearing has been requested and no party has filed an objection. Accordingly, the final order is reversed and the cause is remanded [605] for a new hearing. Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Modern Door & Hardware, 630 So. 2d 604, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13050, 1993 WL 499247 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
630 So. 2d 604 (Martin v. Modern Door & Hardware) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris
469 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)