Martin v. M'Murphy
This text of 5 S.C.L. 555 (Martin v. M'Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only ground for the prohibition in this case, was the want of a written lease. The magistrates, in answer to the rule to show cause, merely certified their proceedings, and require the court to determine the question, upon a view of these proceedings. They do not shew that there was any written lease, nor was it even pretended. Indeed, the return was a tacit acknowledgment, that the allegation in the suggestion was true. The prohibítion, therefore, was properly granted; for magistrates have no such jurisdiction, except where there is a written lease. The motion must, therefore, be rejected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 S.C.L. 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-mmurphy-sc-1816.