Martin v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District

467 S.W.3d 824, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 332, 2015 WL 1476736
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 2015·No. No. ED 101368·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Joan Martin, John Butterfield, Bonnie Butterfield, Lawrence Tuberty, Mary Kay Tuberty, Kelly Javier, and Randy Tober (collectively “Homeowners”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (“MSD”) on their Third Amended Petition.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. ■

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District, 467 S.W.3d 824, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 332, 2015 WL 1476736 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

467 S.W.3d 824 (Martin v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.