Martin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 62 F. App'x 66 (Martin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Nancy C. Martin appeals the district court’s order denying her civil action alleging a claim under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Martin v. Metropolitan Life Ins., Co., No. CV-02-215-02, 2002 WL 32072618 (E.D.Va. Sept. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 F. App'x 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-ca4-2003.