Martin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Fourth Circuit

Martin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

62 F. App'x 66

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2003·No. No. 02-2234·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nancy C. Martin appeals the district court’s order denying her civil action alleging a claim under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Martin v. Metropolitan Life Ins., Co., No. CV-02-215-02, 2002 WL 32072618 (E.D.Va. Sept. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Nancy C. Martin appeals the district court’s order denying her civil action alleging a claim under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Martin v. Metropolitan Life Ins., Co., No. CV-02-215-02, 2002 WL 32072618 (E.D.Va. Sept. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Martin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 62 F. App'x 66 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

62 F. App'x 66 (Martin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.