Martin v. Metropolitan Jockey Club

268 A.D. 1061, 52 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5502
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 1945
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.D. 1061 (Martin v. Metropolitan Jockey Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Metropolitan Jockey Club, 268 A.D. 1061, 52 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered on the verdict of a jury, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by falling on stairs in defendant’s clubhouse. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The method of construction created a question of fact for the jury. (McGahan v. St. Saviors B. G. Church, 290 N. Y. 825; Kern v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Go., 241 N. Y. 600.) Assuming that Mrs. Hilbert, a witness for plaintiff, fell in the grandstand and not in the clubhouse, the jury could infer from her testimony that she fell under similar circumstances in that the construction of the stairway in the grandstand was the same as in the club. Under [1062]*1062such circumstances, her testimony was admissible. (Brady v. M. B. Co., 127 N. Y. 46.) Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Adel, JJ.; Lewis, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heimer v. Stento
270 A.D. 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D. 1061, 52 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-metropolitan-jockey-club-nyappdiv-1945.