Martin v. Metropolitan Dade County

637 So. 2d 313, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4987, 1994 WL 201390
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 24, 1994·No. 93-1928·Published

Opinion

637 So.2d 313 (1994)

Anthony R. MARTIN, Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 93-1928.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 24, 1994.
Rehearing Denied June 14, 1994.

Anthony R. Martin, in pro. per.

Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty. and Murray A. Greenberg and William X. Candela, Asst. County Attys., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment upholding the validity of Dade County Ordinance No. 93-46, which repealed the so-called "anti-bilingual" ordinance adopted in 1980 by the electorate through the initiative process. The trial judge found that (a) section 7.01(7) of the Dade County Home Rule Charter, which authorizes the commission to repeal, after one year, an ordinance adopted by initiative, was itself valid and constitutional and (b) the repealing ordinance did not violate Article II, section 9 of the Florida Constitution which declares English the official language of the state. We agree with both holdings.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Metropolitan Dade County, 637 So. 2d 313, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4987, 1994 WL 201390 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

637 So. 2d 313 (Martin v. Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pugh v. State
637 So. 2d 313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)