Martin v. McCall

564 F. App'x 734
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 3, 2014
DocketNo. 13-7651
StatusPublished

This text of 564 F. App'x 734 (Martin v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. McCall, 564 F. App'x 734 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Fred Martin appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning below. Martin v. McCall, No. 4:13-cv-01567-DCN, 2013 WL 5316316 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 20, entered Sept. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [735]*735materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 F. App'x 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-mccall-ca4-2014.