Martin v. McCall

Fourth Circuit

Martin v. McCall

564 F. App'x 734

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2014·No. No. 13-7651·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Fred Martin appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning below. Martin v. McCall, No. 4:13-cv-01567-DCN, 2013 WL 5316316 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 20, entered Sept. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [735] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Fred Martin appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning below. Martin v. McCall, No. 4:13-cv-01567-DCN, 2013 WL 5316316 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 20, entered Sept. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [735] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Martin v. McCall, 564 F. App'x 734 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

564 F. App'x 734 (Martin v. McCall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related