Martin v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Martin v. Martin

62 N.Y.S. 1142

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 A.D. 445 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 6, 1900·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order to show cause why judgment and order of reversal should not be amended denied. Ordered that the executor retain the fund over which the action arises, and now on deposit with the Security Trust Company of the city of Rochester, with said company until the further order of the court, and, in case any application for its withdrawal is made, notice thereof shall be given to the defendant, William Martin. See 61 N. Y. Supp. 813.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order to show cause why judgment and order of reversal should not be amended denied. Ordered that the executor retain the fund over which the action arises, and now on deposit with the Security Trust Company of the city of Rochester, with said company until the further order of the court, and, in case any application for its withdrawal is made, notice thereof shall be given to the defendant, William Martin. See 61 N. Y. Supp. 813.

Martin v. Martin, 62 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

62 N.Y.S. 1142 (Martin v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related