Martin v. Martin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Martin v. Martin

436 S.W.3d 236, 2013 WL 1209943, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 365

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 26, 2013·No. No. ED 98716·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Martin (“Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment modifying the amount of monthly maintenance she received from John Martin. Wife contends the trial court erred in finding there was a substantial and continuing change of circumstance justifying a reduction in her maintenance because the trial court underestimated her reasonable needs and imper-missibly considered contributions by third parties to her income. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Barbara Martin (“Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment modifying the amount of monthly maintenance she received from John Martin. Wife contends the trial court erred in finding there was a substantial and continuing change of circumstance justifying a reduction in her maintenance because the trial court underestimated her reasonable needs and imper-missibly considered contributions by third parties to her income. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Martin v. Martin, 436 S.W.3d 236, 2013 WL 1209943, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 365 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

436 S.W.3d 236 (Martin v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.