Martin v. Martin

131 Mass. 547, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 318
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 3, 1881·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

This case requires no particular consideration of the question under what circumstances the happening of a condition or contingency, upon which a will declares that it shall take effect, may be a subject of inquiry on the offer of the will for probate; because, in the will before us, the maintenance of the testator for the rest of his life is clearly not intended to be a condition or contingency upon which the validity of the will shall depend, but is mentioned only as the consideration or motive inducing him to make it; and failure of the consideration could not defeat or avoid the will, without a cancelling or revocation by the testator. Damon v. Damon, 8 Allen, 192. Colwell v. Alger, 5 Gray, 67. Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Martin, 131 Mass. 547, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 318 (Mass. 1881).

131 Mass. 547 (Martin v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sommerville Estate
209 A.2d 299 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Bobblis v. Cupol
7 N.E.2d 440 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Stauffer's Estate
20 Pa. D. & C. 517 (Schuylkill County Orphans' Court, 1934)
Morys v. Morys
242 N.W. 420 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1932)
Brennan v. Brennan
71 N.E. 80 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)
Goff v. Britton
65 N.E. 379 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)
Bragdon v. Blaisdell
39 A. 1036 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1898)
Weinreich v. Weinreich
18 Mo. App. 364 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)