Martin v. Martin

775 So. 2d 207, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 448, 2000 WL 1006532
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. Martin. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 584
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 21, 2000·No. 2970032·Published

Opinion

On Remand from the Supreme Court

YATES, Judge.

The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed this court’s judgment insofar as it affirmed the trial court’s allocation of the respective ownership interests in the property, and the case has been remanded to this court. See Ex parte Martin, 775 So.2d 202 (Ala.2000). The judgment of the trial court, insofar as it relates to that allocation, is reversed, and the case is remanded. The trial court is directed to enter a judgment consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

ROBERTSON, P.J., and MONROE, CRAWLEY, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Martin, 775 So. 2d 207, 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 448, 2000 WL 1006532 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

775 So. 2d 207 (Martin v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Martin
775 So. 2d 202 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000)