Martin v. Marshall
This text of 60 Vt. 321 (Martin v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The note in form was executed by the Middle-bury Paper Company, bearing the endorsement of its individual members, to the order of the plaintiff. The maker of the note made a contract with the plaintiff, for the consideration of $24, to raise the money for the company upon said note. To carry out his contract the. plaintiff procured the defendant’s endorsement of the note.
The defendant endorsed the note for the plaintiff’s benefit, not for that of the company. As between the parties, the defendant came into the relation of a surety for the plaintiff, and the plaintiff was bound to indemnify the defendant against loss [325]*325by reason of his endorsement. As between the parties to the endorsement upon the note, parol evidence may be received to show their true relation to each other. An apparent surety may be shown to be a real principal, and an apparent principal may be shown to be a real surety.
The defendant having signed merely for the accommodation of the plaintiff, is not liable to contribution, as the plaintiff, so far as the defendant is concerned, has paid his own debt.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Vt. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-marshall-vt-1888.