Martin v. Lynch

New York Court of Common Pleas

Martin v. Lynch

35 N.Y.S. 135, 14 Misc. 47, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 379

DecidedAugust 27, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 35 N.Y.S. 135 (Martin v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Lynch, 35 N.Y.S. 135, 14 Misc. 47, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 379 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

GIEGERICH, J.

The motion is made upon the original papers. Hence, as upon a demurrer, the facts alleged are to be taken as true. Evans v. Holmes, 46 How. Prac. 515. However, assuming the defendant’s fraud to have been shown, it is clear, from the plaintiff’s own statement, that he was aware of the facts in question when he accepted the defendant’s promissory note for the sum now sought to be recovered, the legal effect of which acceptance was to change his claim for a wrong into a debt. Alliance Ins. Co. v. Cleveland, 14 How. Prac. 408. Until the note became due the cause of action was in abeyance (see case last cited), and yet the summons upon which the order was founded was served seven days before the date of maturity. For these reasons the motion should be granted, with $10 costs to the defendant, to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIEGERICH, J.

The motion is made upon the original papers. Hence, as upon a demurrer, the facts alleged are to be taken as true. Evans v. Holmes, 46 How. Prac. 515. However, assuming the defendant’s fraud to have been shown, it is clear, from the plaintiff’s own statement, that he was aware of the facts in question when he accepted the defendant’s promissory note for the sum now sought to be recovered, the legal effect of which acceptance was to change his claim for a wrong into a debt. Alliance Ins. Co. v. Cleveland, 14 How. Prac. 408. Until the note became due the cause of action was in abeyance (see case last cited), and yet the summons upon which the order was founded was served seven days before the date of maturity. For these reasons the motion should be granted, with $10 costs to the defendant, to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 N.Y.S. 135, 14 Misc. 47, 69 N.Y. St. Rep. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-lynch-nyctcompl-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack