Martin v. Leo J. Meyer

110 S.W.2d 440, 270 Ky. 645, 1937 Ky. LEXIS 136
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
DecidedNovember 16, 1937
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.W.2d 440 (Martin v. Leo J. Meyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Leo J. Meyer, 110 S.W.2d 440, 270 Ky. 645, 1937 Ky. LEXIS 136 (Ky. 1937).

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Creal, Commissioner

Affirming.

Leo J. Meyers has recovered judgment against D. A. Fleenor and E. H. Martin for $4,000 for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained when a bus owned by the former and a truck owned by the latter came in collision and Martin alone is appealing. ■ The driver of the bus and the driver of the truck were made parties defendant.

This appeal and the appeal of E. H. Martin v. Loretta Ackman, 270 Ky. 640, 110 S. W. (2d) 437, have *646 been considered together, the actions having grown, ont of the same accident. The pleadings are the same and they were heard together below, and, while separate appeals have been prosecuted,' the same questions are presented for review, and therefore on the authority of the opinion this day handed down in the case of E. H. Martin v. Loretta Ackman, the judgment must be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Ackman
110 S.W.2d 437 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.W.2d 440, 270 Ky. 645, 1937 Ky. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-leo-j-meyer-kyctapphigh-1937.