Martin v. Lake
37 La. Ann. 763
Opinions
On Motion to Dismiss
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The ground of the motion is that the amount in dispute 'does not exceed two thousand dollars.
[764]*764From the evidence in the record, admitted on this point without objection, we are satisfied that the reasonable value of the lands in controversy does exceed the amount of the lower limit of our jurisdiction,, hence the motion must be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Lake, 37 La. Ann. 763 (La. 1885).
37 La. Ann. 763 (Martin v. Lake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. v. Houma Town House Apartments, Inc.
238 So. 2d 9 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)
Meadow Brook National Bank v. Recile
302 F. Supp. 62 (E.D. Louisiana, 1969)
Gumpert v. Signal
156 So. 174 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1934)
Gumpert v. Signal
152 So. 403 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)
Unity Plan Finance Co. v. Green
148 So. 297 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1933)