Martin v. Kimball

99 A. 1070, 86 N.J. Eq. 432, 1 Stock. 432, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 472
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 20, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 99 A. 1070 (Martin v. Kimball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Kimball, 99 A. 1070, 86 N.J. Eq. 432, 1 Stock. 432, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 472 (N.J. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in -the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trbnchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Hee-EENHEIMBR, TAYLOR, GARDNER-12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Emmert v. Old National Bank of Martinsburg
246 S.E.2d 236 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1978)
Green v. Green
36 A.2d 217 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Lembeck v. Lembeck
145 A. 327 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)
Richardson v. McCloskey
276 S.W. 680 (Texas Supreme Court, 1925)
Berger v. Burnett
127 A. 160 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A. 1070, 86 N.J. Eq. 432, 1 Stock. 432, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-kimball-nj-1916.