Martin v. Key Largo Kampground, Inc.

501 So. 2d 648, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 136, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11159
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1986·No. No. 86-1012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In its final order the trial court directed the defendants, John and Connie Martin, to remove a certain platform or, in the alternative, to apply in the manner prescribed by the condominium by-laws to the condominium board of directors for approval of the platform. The board was further directed to approve the platform upon receipt of a proper timely application. The trial court concluded that the plaintiff-appellee condominium association, Key Largo Kampground, was the prevailing party and, therefore, entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 718.303(1), Florida Statutes (1983). This record demonstrates that the only right Key Largo Kampground vindicated was its right to be asked. On these facts, Key Largo Kampground was not the prevailing party. See Kirou v. Oceanside Plaza Condominium Ass’n, 425 So.2d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The order of the trial court determining the association to be the prevailing party is, accordingly,

REVERSED.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Key Largo Kampground, Inc., 501 So. 2d 648, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 136, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

501 So. 2d 648 (Martin v. Key Largo Kampground, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gonzalez and Leal v. International Park Condominium I Assoc., Inc.
217 So. 3d 1128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Village of Kings Creek Condominium Ass'n v. Goldberg
596 So. 2d 1195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)