Martin v. Kendall

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martin v. Kendall

96 So. 2d 668

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 12, 1957

DocketNo. 57-55

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 96 So. 2d 668 (Martin v. Kendall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Kendall, 96 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral [669]*669argument at the bar of this Court. From our perusal of the record we reached the conclusion that the jury verdict was arrived at in this case upon consideration of conflicting evidence and should not be disturbed.

The record holds evidence sufficient to sustain the jury’s finding of negligence on the part of the defendant, and no useful purpose would be served by restating the evidence in detail in this opinion. Accordingly, the appellant’s contention that the Court erred in refusing to grant a directed verdict is rejected.

Affirmed.

CHAS. CARROLL, C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs of counsel in this cause and heard oral [669]*669argument at the bar of this Court. From our perusal of the record we reached the conclusion that the jury verdict was arrived at in this case upon consideration of conflicting evidence and should not be disturbed.

The record holds evidence sufficient to sustain the jury’s finding of negligence on the part of the defendant, and no useful purpose would be served by restating the evidence in detail in this opinion. Accordingly, the appellant’s contention that the Court erred in refusing to grant a directed verdict is rejected.

Affirmed.

CHAS. CARROLL, C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 So. 2d 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-kendall-fladistctapp-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack