Martin v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Martin v. Kaplan

235 A.D. 787

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 787 (Martin v. Kaplan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Kaplan, 235 A.D. 787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.; Finch, P. J., and Martin, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant the motion for a peremptory order of mandamus so as to plaee"petitioner’s name on the list for the next certification requested by the fire commissioner. The civil service commission should correct its palpable error. (See People ex rel. Finnegan v. McBride, 226 N. Y. 252, and Matter of Oystermen’s Dock Co. v. Downing, 258 id. 156.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.; Finch, P. J., and Martin, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant the motion for a peremptory order of mandamus so as to plaee"petitioner’s name on the list for the next certification requested by the fire commissioner. The civil service commission should correct its palpable error. (See People ex rel. Finnegan v. McBride, 226 N. Y. 252, and Matter of Oystermen’s Dock Co. v. Downing, 258 id. 156.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-kaplan-nyappdiv-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack