Martin v. Jones

253 P.2d 365, 122 Utah 609

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 Utah 597 →

Utah Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1953·No. No. 7766·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was reargued upon rehearing granted. The facts and the law have been re-examined and the court has been fully apprised in the premises.

A majority of the court is of the opinion that the previous decision in this case reported at 122 Utah 597, 253 P. 2d 359, should be affirmed for the reasons stated therein. It is so ordered.

HENRIOD, J., dissents. HENDRICKS, D. J., dissents for the reasons set forth in his former dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case was reargued upon rehearing granted. The facts and the law have been re-examined and the court has been fully apprised in the premises.

A majority of the court is of the opinion that the previous decision in this case reported at 122 Utah 597, 253 P. 2d 359, should be affirmed for the reasons stated therein. It is so ordered.

HENRIOD, J., dissents. HENDRICKS, D. J., dissents for the reasons set forth in his former dissenting opinion.

Martin v. Jones, 253 P.2d 365, 122 Utah 609 (Utah 1953).

Pincite

253 P.2d 365 (Martin v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Martin v. Jones

253 P.2d 359 (Utah Supreme Court, 1953)

Opinion

Related