Martin v. Jones

15 Iowa 240, 1863 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 57
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided October 15, 1863·Published

Opinion

Lows, J.

In this Court the appellants make three points.

First. That it was not competent for the Court below to decree a foreclosure without securing to the defendant the right of a twelve months’ redemption under the law. This point is held against them in the cases of Kramer v. Rebman, 9 Iowa, 114, and Stoddard v. Hays et ux., 12 Iowa, 576.

Second. That the Court erred in decreeing that the defendants deliver immediate possession of the premises to plaintiff. This ruling is sustained by the authority of the case, Thatcher v Haun et al., 12 Iowa, 303; White v. Hampton et al., 13 Id., 259.

Third. That the Court erred in decreeing costs against defendants, without discriminating as to which one of the defendants shall pay the costs. This point is. abandoned in argument and could not be made for the first time in this Court. The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Jones, 15 Iowa 240, 1863 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 57 (iowa 1863).

15 Iowa 240 (Martin v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kramer v. Rebman
9 Iowa 114 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1859)
Thatcher v. Haun
12 Iowa 303 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1861)
Stoddard v. Hays
12 Iowa 576 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1862)