Martin v. Jerks

186 S.E. 732, 182 Ga. 648, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 526
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 2, 1936
DocketNo. 11018
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 S.E. 732 (Martin v. Jerks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Jerks, 186 S.E. 732, 182 Ga. 648, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 526 (Ga. 1936).

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

A suit was instituted for specific performance of an alleged contract. A third person filed an intervention. A demurrer interposed by the defendant was overruled. The plaintiff dismissed the main action. The case was tried on the intervention. At the conclusion of evidence a nonsuit was granted, and the intervenor excepted. Held, that the intervention was subject to the fate of the main case, which having been dismissed, the intervention necessarily failed, whether or not it was supported by evidence. Consequently the judge did not err in granting a nonsuit.

The ease differs from Eastmore v. Bunkley, 113 Ga. 637 (39 S. E. 105), in which the intervention was by one as a defendant seeking to prevent a recovery by the plaintiff in the main action.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haisten v. TANNER-BRICE COMPANY
89 S.E.2d 172 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 S.E. 732, 182 Ga. 648, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-jerks-ga-1936.