Martin v. Hunt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Martin v. Hunt

240 A.D. 1013

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 1013 (Martin v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Hunt, 240 A.D. 1013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from judgment dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the judgment was entered on default and is not appealable. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 557, subd. 1; White v. Sebring, 228 App. Div. 415.) Order of June 5, 1933, on reargument of motion, entered September 20, 1933, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum. The appellants assert in their brief in substance that the order appealed from is not a denial of a motion to open a default. They treat it as a motion to vacate the judgment for irregularities and we treat it as such. Appeals from other orders included in the appeal book and referred to in appellants’ brief have already been dismissed. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from judgment dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the judgment was entered on default and is not appealable. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 557, subd. 1; White v. Sebring, 228 App. Div. 415.) Order of June 5, 1933, on reargument of motion, entered September 20, 1933, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum. The appellants assert in their brief in substance that the order appealed from is not a denial of a motion to open a default. They treat it as a motion to vacate the judgment for irregularities and we treat it as such. Appeals from other orders included in the appeal book and referred to in appellants’ brief have already been dismissed. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-hunt-nyappdiv-1933.