Martin v. Hickey

733 So. 2d 600, 1999 WL 391593
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 1999·No. 98-1197·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

733 So.2d 600 (1999)

Prentice MARTIN, Appellant,
v.
Jerry C. HICKEY, Appellee.

No. 98-1197.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 16, 1999.

Prentice Martin, in proper person.

No appearance for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

After Ms. Martin had obtained a domestic violence restraining order against the appellee he secured the one on appeal against her. While we have some sympathy for the trial judge's apparent belief that it could do no harm to enter what, in effect, were mutual restraining orders, the one presently under review is not, as required, independently supported by the pertinent evidentiary requirements, see § 741.30(1)(i), Fla. Stat. (1997); Hixson v. Hixson, 698 So.2d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), and is therefore

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Hickey, 733 So. 2d 600, 1999 WL 391593 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

733 So. 2d 600 (Martin v. Hickey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gill v. Gill
50 So. 3d 772 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Mossbrooks v. Advincula
748 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)