Martin v. Hickey
This text of 733 So. 2d 600 (Martin v. Hickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Prentice MARTIN, Appellant,
v.
Jerry C. HICKEY, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Prentice Martin, in proper person.
No appearance for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
After Ms. Martin had obtained a domestic violence restraining order against the appellee he secured the one on appeal against her. While we have some sympathy for the trial judge's apparent belief that it could do no harm to enter what, in effect, were mutual restraining orders, the one presently under review is not, as required, independently supported by the pertinent evidentiary requirements, see § 741.30(1)(i), Fla. Stat. (1997); Hixson v. Hixson, 698 So.2d 639 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), and is therefore
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
733 So. 2d 600, 1999 WL 391593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-hickey-fladistctapp-1999.