Martin v. Hamilton

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Martin v. Hamilton

28 Misc. 768, 58 N.Y.S. 1118

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Misc. 768 (Martin v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Hamilton, 28 Misc. 768, 58 N.Y.S. 1118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinions

MacLean, J.

To this action, brought to recover rent admittedly due according to the terms of a written lease, the defendant urged as defense a collateral agreement on the part of the plaintiff to provide storeroom and suitable bicycle accommodations for the [769]*769defendant and his family, and its breach. Upon the evidence introduced the trial justice rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and, in the absence of circumstances calling for interference by this court, the judgment should be affirmed.

Freedman, P. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacLean, J.

To this action, brought to recover rent admittedly due according to the terms of a written lease, the defendant urged as defense a collateral agreement on the part of the plaintiff to provide storeroom and suitable bicycle accommodations for the [769]*769defendant and his family, and its breach. Upon the evidence introduced the trial justice rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and, in the absence of circumstances calling for interference by this court, the judgment should be affirmed.

Freedman, P. J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Misc. 768, 58 N.Y.S. 1118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-hamilton-nyappterm-1899.