Martin v. George A. Hormel & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Martin v. George A. Hormel & Co.

439 N.W.2d 25, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 103, 1989 WL 44510

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 5, 1989·No. No. CX-88-2534·Published

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 15, 1988, is in compliance with the review standards of Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54 (Minn.1984); and

WHEREAS, benefits were denied on alternate grounds by operation of the 350-week limitation on temporary benefits in effect at the time of injury;

[26] IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 15, 1988, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minnesota Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

WHEREAS, the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 15, 1988, is in compliance with the review standards of Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54 (Minn.1984); and

WHEREAS, benefits were denied on alternate grounds by operation of the 350-week limitation on temporary benefits in effect at the time of injury;

[26] IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 15, 1988, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minnesota Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure 136.01, subd. 1(b).

Martin v. George A. Hormel & Co., 439 N.W.2d 25, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 103, 1989 WL 44510 (Mich. 1989).

Pincite

439 N.W.2d 25 (Martin v. George A. Hormel & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related