Martin v. George A. Hormel & Co.
This text of 439 N.W.2d 25 (Martin v. George A. Hormel & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
WHEREAS, the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 15, 1988, is in compliance with the review standards of Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54 (Minn.1984); and
WHEREAS, benefits were denied on alternate grounds by operation of the 350-week limitation on temporary benefits in effect at the time of injury;
[26]*26IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 15, 1988, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Minnesota Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure 136.01, subd. 1(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 N.W.2d 25, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 103, 1989 WL 44510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-george-a-hormel-co-minn-1989.