Martin v. Franklin

4 Johns. 123
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1809
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Johns. 123 (Martin v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Franklin, 4 Johns. 123 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The debt is to be paid according to the par, and not the rate of exchange. It is recoverable and payable here to the plaintiffs or their agent; and the courts are not to inquire into the disposition of the debt, after it reaches the hands of the agent. He may remit the debt to his principal abroad, in bills of exchange, or he may invest it here on his behalf, or transmit it to some other part of the United States, or to other countries, on the same account. We cannot trace the disposition which is to take place, subsequent to the recovery, nor award special damages upon such uncertain calculations. All that the plaintiffs can ask, is their debt, justly liquidated and paid, in the lawful currency of the United States.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crow, McCreary & Co. v. Vance
4 Iowa 434 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1857)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Johns. 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-franklin-nysupct-1809.