Martin v. Dyer-Kane Co.

166 A. 227, 113 N.J. Eq. 88, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 988
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 27, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 166 A. 227 (Martin v. Dyer-Kane Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Dyer-Kane Co., 166 A. 227, 113 N.J. Eq. 88, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 988 (N.J. 1933).

Opinion

*93 Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paexee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Transcon Lines v. Lipo Chem., Inc.
474 A.2d 1108 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
Nigro v. Flinn
192 A. 685 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1937)
In Re Williams
177 A. 85 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A. 227, 113 N.J. Eq. 88, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-dyer-kane-co-nj-1933.