Martin v. Dyer-Kane Co.
166 A. 227, 113 N.J. Eq. 88, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 988
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paexee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Van Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Dyer-Kane Co., 166 A. 227, 113 N.J. Eq. 88, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 988 (N.J. 1933).
166 A. 227 (Martin v. Dyer-Kane Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Transcon Lines v. Lipo Chem., Inc.
474 A.2d 1108 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
Nigro v. Flinn
192 A. 685 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1937)
In Re Williams
177 A. 85 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)