Martin v. Dupont Flooring System, Inc.
This text of 125 F. App'x 369 (Martin v. Dupont Flooring System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Familiarity by the parties is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues. Plaintiff-appellant Michelle Martin brought an action against defendants, claiming breach of contract, promissory estoppel, negligent misrepresentation, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, and discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e—2000e-17. The district court granted summary judgment to defendants on all counts. Having considered all of Martin’s arguments, we affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by Judge Underhill.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 F. App'x 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-dupont-flooring-system-inc-ca2-2005.