Martin v. Drinan

128 Mass. 515, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 136
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedApril 5, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 128 Mass. 515 (Martin v. Drinan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Drinan, 128 Mass. 515, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 136 (Mass. 1880).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The agreement to repair buildings upon land adjoining the defendant’s, being contained in a deed poll to her, and not being under her seal, is not a covenant, and this action is in the nature of assumpsit on the promise implied from the acceptance of the deed." Maine v. Cumston, 98 Mass. 317, 320, and cases cited. It would be difficult, if not impossible, to maintain the action against an assign of the promisor. Parish v. Whitney, 3 Gray, 516. Bronson v. Coffin, 108 Mass. 175, 186. And it is quite clear that it cannot be maintained in the name of an assign of the promisee. Standen v. Chrismas, 10 Q. B. 135. Bickford v. Parson, 5 C. B. 920.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Akasu v. Power
91 N.E.2d 224 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Putnam Furniture Building, Inc. v. Commonwealth
80 N.E.2d 649 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)
Utilities Production Corp. v. Southwestern Natural Gas Co.
11 A.2d 275 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1940)
Everett Factories & Terminal Corp. v. Oldetyme Distillers Corp.
15 N.E.2d 829 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)
Mayo v. Dearborn
163 A. 779 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1933)
Shade v. M. O'Keefe, Inc.
156 N.E. 867 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1927)
Millikan v. Hunter
100 N.E. 1041 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1913)
Childs v. Boston & Maine Railroad
99 N.E. 957 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)
Sjoblom v. Mark
114 N.W. 746 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)
Pearson v. Bailey
58 N.E. 1028 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Sanger v. Warren
44 S.W. 477 (Texas Supreme Court, 1898)
Whittenton Manufacturing Co. v. Staples
29 L.R.A. 500 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
King v. Wight
29 N.E. 644 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Midland Railway Co. v. Fisher
8 L.R.A. 604 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Willard v. Wood
15 D.C. 538 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1886)
Kennedy v. Owen
136 Mass. 199 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 Mass. 515, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-drinan-mass-1880.