Martin v. Drinan
This text of 128 Mass. 515 (Martin v. Drinan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The agreement to repair buildings upon land adjoining the defendant’s, being contained in a deed poll to her, and not being under her seal, is not a covenant, and this action is in the nature of assumpsit on the promise implied from the acceptance of the deed." Maine v. Cumston, 98 Mass. 317, 320, and cases cited. It would be difficult, if not impossible, to maintain the action against an assign of the promisor. Parish v. Whitney, 3 Gray, 516. Bronson v. Coffin, 108 Mass. 175, 186. And it is quite clear that it cannot be maintained in the name of an assign of the promisee. Standen v. Chrismas, 10 Q. B. 135. Bickford v. Parson, 5 C. B. 920.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 Mass. 515, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-drinan-mass-1880.