Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc.

879 N.E.2d 781, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1471
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 23, 2008·No. 2007-2023·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Summit App. No. 23422, 2007-Ohio-4805. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed October 24, 2007:

“Whether in an action for temporary damages to noncommercial real property, a failure to prove [1472] the difference between the fan’ market value of the whole property just before the damage was done and immediately thereafter is fatal to the claim.”

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

The conflict cases are Adcock v. Rollins Protective Servs. Co. (1981), 1 Ohio App.3d 160, and Krofta v. Stallard, Cuyahoga App. No. 85369, 2005-Ohio-3720.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-2024, Martin v. Design Constr. Sews., Inc., Summit App. No. 23422, 2007-Ohio-4805.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc., 879 N.E.2d 781, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1471 (Ohio 2008).

879 N.E.2d 781 (Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Design Construction Services, Inc.
902 N.E.2d 10 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)