Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc.

879 N.E.2d 781, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1471

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 23, 2008

Docket2007-2023

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 879 N.E.2d 781 (Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc., 879 N.E.2d 781, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1471 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Summit App. No. 23422, 2007-Ohio-4805. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed October 24, 2007:

“Whether in an action for temporary damages to noncommercial real property, a failure to prove [1472]*1472the difference between the fan’ market value of the whole property just before the damage was done and immediately thereafter is fatal to the claim.”

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

The conflict cases are Adcock v. Rollins Protective Servs. Co. (1981), 1 Ohio App.3d 160, and Krofta v. Stallard, Cuyahoga App. No. 85369, 2005-Ohio-3720.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-2024, Martin v. Design Constr. Sews., Inc., Summit App. No. 23422, 2007-Ohio-4805.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI