Martin v. Dept. of Transp.
882 A.2d 1001, 584 Pa. 158, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1849
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 26, 2005·No. Petition 333 MAL 2005·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of August 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The parties are directed to brief the following issue:
Whether a municipal police officer has authority under the Municipal Police Jurisdiction Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8951 et seq., to conduct an extraterritorial arrest of a motorist or implement the Implied Consent Law where the officer has no grounds for arrest or probable cause in the officer’s own jurisdiction but grounds for arrest arise after the officer leaves his jurisdiction in pursuit of the motorist.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Dept. of Transp., 882 A.2d 1001, 584 Pa. 158, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1849 (Pa. 2005).
882 A.2d 1001 (Martin v. Dept. of Transp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Henry
943 A.2d 967 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)
Martin v. DOT, Bureau of Driver Licensing
905 A.2d 438 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)